On Greatness
On Greatness
Bill Clinton once lamented that he
wished the 9/11 terrorist attacks would have occurred during his
presidency. He longed for the responsibility to lead a response to
crisis, because he understood great leaders are not remebmered for
their actions in good times, rather for how they respond to disaster
or hardship. In examining the responses of Lincoln to the succession
of the South, Franklin D. Roosevelt to the Great Depression and the
Rise of Hitler, and the response fo George W. Bush to 9/11 and
Katrina we that the greatness of a politcal leader delpends more on
his or her success in responsing to crisis than in inherent skill,
ability or overal likeability.
Lincoln came from a humble
background and was not known for his brilliance or greatness. He was
not a decorated war hero or celebrated scholar, rather a straight
shooting common man with just enough support to squeeze out the
electoral votes for reelection. While he was a strong orator it
wasn't his speeches that built him a monument in Washington, it was a
decisive response to crisis. When Congress finally outlawed slavery
bringing the American reality in line with her ideals the southern
states attempted to secede from the union, form a confederacy and
continue carrying out their traditional racial divides. Some
presidents may have backed down, others may have made concessions and
sought compromise, but not Abe Lincoln. The battles were
particularly bloody, often pitting brother against brother in the
battlefield. The cost was high, with more American deaths than any
other conflict, yet in the end, Abe Lincoln has been remembered as a
great leader, honored with a monument in Washington, D.C., his image
on the 5 dollar bill and penny, and a legacy of preserving the
naition nd ending the evil of slavery once and for all. It was not
his oratory talent, or peace time rule with modest approval ratings,
but his decisive response to disaster for which he is commemorated.
Franklin roosevelt was another
president who proved his political greatness in his response to the
Great Depression and the attack on Pearl Harbor. A somewhat soft
fellow fighting polio and eventually confined to a wheel chair
doesn't sound like the description for a great political leader. At
the time, great lengths were taken to hide such a reality from the
public. However, Franklin Roosevelt's actions earned him four
election victories, triumph over Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan, and
the legacy of a nation responsible for 40% of the world's economic
output. FDR inherited the presidency at a time when our financial
system was in total collapse. Our farms were failing, our banks were
closing, our markets had bust, the workers were unemployed and the
people were destitute. While his predecessor lead by a state of
denial, allowing for a prolonged free-fall, FDR swiftly moved to
restore hope. His weekly fireside chat radio broadcasts eased the
public's anxiety while his aggressive public works programs and his
creation of social security all helped to ease panic while wisely
keeping our nation both productive and secure. While he attempted to
keep us out of Europe's squabbles, the attack on Pearl Harbor by
Imperial Japan galvanized public support for out enterance into WWII.
America helped quickly change the
momentum of the war, pushing back Germany from the French coast to
rin, crushing Mousalini, and eventually Hitler while setting the
stage for Japan's defeat in the Pacific Hemisphere. The war machine
put all to work while our factories produced more innovative products
faster than ever before. Meanwhile, our competitors were flattened
as the American mainlands remained unscathed. FDR modernized our
nation, defending our cities and the people of Europe from fascism,
transforming a failed economy into an unprecedented economic
juggernaut and world super-power.
The presidency of George W. Bush
shows that challenge alone does not secure percieved political
greatness. While the 9/11 attacks brought the American people
closely together and earned him high approval ratings early in his
presidency, his lack of diplomatic tact and cowboy self-image damaged
American people on behalf of a narrow click of staunch supporters
inside the military industrial complex certain to make fortunes by
war. While a response to terror was required,, and our initial
invasion of Taliban Afghanistan a multi-national success, our mission
in Iraq was misdirected from the start, sold to the public on a false
pre-tense, carried out sloppily, diverting resouces and focus from
Afghanistan, jeapordizing our mission to defeat both the Taliban and
Al-Qaeda. What shold have been a quick liberation by more competant
leadership became a challenging quagmire as their inability to
involve Turkey, allow for Saddam loyalists to flee into the Sunni
Triangle while the foolish disbanding of the military guaranteed an
insurgency. Drafting a parliamentry consittutiona s opposed to a
confederated nation with three distinct states for the distinct
ethnic groups, doomed the young democracy to politicla gridlock and
civil war. While time and the wise leadership of Robert Gates helped
the situation to approve the whole ordeal was six years longer than
it should have been and is likely the reason the Taliban has yet to
be defeated. The disaster in Lousiana, during Huricane Katrina
further destroyed the legacy of of Bush as a botched Government
response lead to 10,000 deaths tunring the thunderdome to a horror
dome where poor Africna American communities were broadcast to the
nation in concentration camp like conditions stigmatizing fema as a
failure and prompting paranoia and fear about an improtant disaster
response unit. The final guagh was the burst in a real estate bubble
proping up our economy and financing the lifestyles of the American
middle class. For George Bush, the challenges were there, but aside
from the cooky evangelical right and cowboy hat wearing Texans its
hard to imagine George Bush being remembered as a great political
leader. His awkward prose and clumsy befumbling of immense
opportunities smear his reputation leaving only a dark chapter in
American history to his legacy.
No matter the president or
politcal party, the lessons of history show that challenge alone is
not enough to cement a legacy of greatness. To be remembered for
greatness one must respond to challenge with skill and ability that
drive results. Whether it was George Washington or Ronald Reagan,
these leadres are rememberd as great because they succeeded in the
face of adversity, freeing us from tryanny and defending us from
communism. President Obama has been charged with the difficult task
of clening up George Bush's mess. He must be reminded that merely
responding to the housing crisis, escalating our role in Afghanistan
and ending the war in Iraq will not guarantee greatness. Ending the
housing crisis, defeating al-Qaeda and leaving functional governance
across the Middle East while restoring the American Dream for working
people and the middle class will ensure his name a celebrated place
in the history books of the future.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home